OUTCOME COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION TREATMENT WITH HIGHLY PURIFIED SUBCUTANEOUS FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE (FERTINEX, A UROFOLLITROPIN) VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR MENOTROPINS
Jl. Crain et al., OUTCOME COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION TREATMENT WITH HIGHLY PURIFIED SUBCUTANEOUS FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE (FERTINEX, A UROFOLLITROPIN) VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR MENOTROPINS, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 179(2), 1998, pp. 299-305
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate various outcome me
asures of stimulation with highly purified subcutaneous follicle-stimu
lating hormone (Fertinex, a urofollitropin) compared with first- and s
econd-generation urinary human menopausal gonadotropin standards (Perg
onal, Metrodin). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis was restricted t
o our most efficient in vitro fertilization age group (23-34 years). D
ata from Institute for Assisted Reproduction in vitro fertilization cy
cles 1 through 11 with Pergonal, Metrodin, or both were tabulated for
hormonal values, oocyte quality, and embryo outcome as baseline data.
Patients in cycles 12 through 13 were treated with Fertinex and Pergon
al or Fertinex alone and then reviewed for the same parameters. RESULT
S: Two hundred thirty-eight in vitro fertilization records with embryo
transfer were analyzed. Clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer
in an optimal age group were similar despite use of first- through thi
rd-generation urinary gonadotropin preparations: Pergonal and Metrodin
, 67%; Metrodin, 64%; Fertinex and Pergonal, 62%; and Fertinex, 54%. T
here were no discernible differences in hormonal response, oocyte reco
very, or embryonic growth. CONCLUSION: Administered subcutaneously, th
e third-generation urinary gonadotropin preparation Fertinex is effect
ive in in vitro fertilization treatment in young women.