Background: Laparoscopic skill was measured objectively in a simulator
, Seven tasks were scored in terms of precision and speed. These tasks
included transferring, cutting, clip+ divide, placement of a ligating
loop, mesh placement+ fixation, and suturing with intracorporeal and
extracorporeal knot. Methods: After baseline evaluation, 12 surgical r
esidents were randomized to either five weekly practice sessions (Grou
p A) or no practice (Group B). Each group was then retested. Performan
ce scores were compared for baseline versus final test, and improvemen
t (baseline to final) for Group A versus Group B, Group A residents ha
d a total of seven repetitions of each task (baseline, five practices,
final). Linear regression analysis was used to test for the correlati
on between score and repetition number. Results: Group A showed signif
icant improvement in their scores (baseline to final) for each task an
d for the total score (sum of all tasks) (p < 0.05). Group B showed si
gnificant improvement in four of seven tasks and for the total score.
The magnitude of improvement of Group A versus Group B residents was s
ignificantly greater for four of seven tasks (peg transfer, placement
of ligating loop, and both suturing skills) and for the total score. T
he final total score for Group A was 219 +/- 14% of baseline (p < 0.00
01), whereas Group B was only 162 +/- 35% of baseline (p = 0.07) and n
ot statistically significant. For Group A residents, there was a highl
y significant correlation between trial number and performance score (
p < 0.05); for each individual task and for the total score. Conclusio
ns: Laparoscopic skill can be measured objectively in a simulator, and
performance improves progressively with practice. These skills can be
incorporated into the training and evaluation of residents in laparos
copic surgery.