Because Basque is a triple agreement language, its system of agreement
paradigms is extremely complicated. Based on evidence that Basque, a
primarily ergative language; has some active/inactive characteristics,
six classes of verbs are identified; the corresponding auxiliary para
digms yield a theoretical total of 336 forms possible for each tense.
Nevertheless, there are certain methods by which the system is greatly
simplified. Paradigm identity reduces the number of paradigms necessa
ry to produce all forms. Furthermore, the paradigms do not contain all
logically possible forms. It is impossible to form an auxiliary for a
sentence with ''marking-overload'' characteristics (a ditransitive se
ntence whose direct object is a first or second person nominal). Marki
ng-overload combinations arise frequently in sentences with the causat
ive verb arazi (compared to causative verb behartu in Appendix I). Mec
hanisms of avoidance allow marking-overload combinations to be express
ed within the existing system of paradigms. Such mechanisms are discus
sed for both simple and causative sentences. Cross-linguistically, the
ways in which paradigms may be trimmed and the mechanisms used to exp
ress marking-overload combination's are extremely limited. It is sugge
sted that these may pertain to a certain cluster of characteristics th
at occur consistently in triple agreement languages.