Given that the United States lacks a coherent national science policy,
the question then becomes whether such policy should (or could) be de
veloped in the current political environment. The author explores this
question from the perspectives of overall budgetary support, priority
-setting, and research relevance, concluding that the exercise of deve
loping a national policy, even if ultimately unsuccessful, could help
to reaffirm science's national importance and autonomy and to coalesce
its fragmented political support.