As program evaluation has developed over the last twenty years into a
viable profession, its central challenge has become to define what it
means to be an evaluator This debate is fueled less by traditional div
isions between academic and service-related professionals, or disagree
ments over methodologies, than by sharply different visions of the eva
luator's moral and political role, derived from the profession's histo
ric roofs in principles of social justice and concern for individual r
ights.