Pm. Makila, A MARTINGALE KRONECKER LEMMA AND PARAMETER-ESTIMATION FOR LINEAR-SYSTEMS - COMMENT, IEEE transactions on automatic control, 43(9), 1998, pp. 1265-1267
Recently the issue of fragile controllers (high sensitivity of closed-
loop stability and/or performance to small changes in controller coeff
icients) produced by using popular robust and optimal control synthesi
s methods was raised by the above-mentioned paper.(1) This paper had a
t least three serious flaws. First, the authors did not provide any re
ferences to the wide earlier work in which methods are given to analyz
e and solve fragility and related robustness issues. Second, Keel and
Bhattacharyya used mostly simple textbook examples in which the optimi
zation criteria for controller synthesis were so simple that they do n
ot incorporate realistic design considerations. This also resulted in
the third big flaw of the paper by Keel and Bhattacharyya; namely, the
possible explanation given to the cause of these problems via holes i
n parametric stability space for high-order controllers is misplaced.
A more direct explanation is in the badly chosen optimization criteria
and controller parameterizations which make the controller synthesis
and realization problems considered rather unrealistic and (mathematic
ally) ill-posed. In the present paper we comment on the paper by Keel
and Bhattacharyya and discuss fragility and other robustness issues th
rough the well-established tools of coprime factorizations and robustn
ess optimization. The main conclusion is that by adopting sensible opt
imization criteria, which take into account enough of the important de
sign considerations directly, and numerically robust controller parame
terizations, controller fragility should not be a big problem in appli
cations of modern robust and optimal control theory.