J. Dechamplain et al., DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF NIFEDIPINE AND AMLODIPINE ON CIRCULATING CATECHOLAMINE LEVELS IN ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS, Journal of hypertension, 16(9), 1998, pp. 1357-1369
Objective To compare the acute and chronic effects of nifedipine retar
d (NPA), nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (NGITS) and am
lodipine at trough and peak plasma concentrations of drug on blood pre
ssure and heart rate, and on plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine lev
els in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pr
essure 95-115 mmHg). Design and methods After 3-4 weeks' placebo treat
ment, patients of both sexes were randomly allocated to be administere
d 10 or 20 mg NPA twice a day, 30 or 60 mg NGITS once a day, and 5 or
10 mg amlodipine once a day for 6 weeks. Initially, for the first 2 we
eks, the lowest dose of each drug was used, but higher doses were admi
nistered after 2 weeks if sitting diastolic blood pressure was > 90 mm
Hg. Patients were evaluated after administration of the first dose and
after 6 weeks' therapy in a hospital setting, Blood samples were take
n for high-performance liquid chromatography measurement of catecholam
ine and drug levels at various intervals for a period covering trough
to peak drug level ranges. Results Administration of all three drugs r
educed clinic blood pressure to the same level after 6 weeks' therapy,
but heart rate was increased slightly only with amlodipine (P< 0.05),
Administration of NPA reduced blood pressure more abruptly whereas ad
ministrations of NGITS and amlodipine induced smoother falls after acu
te and chronic treatments: a significant increase in heart rate was ob
served with amlodipine after chronic treatment. Both acute and chronic
treatments with NPA (n = 19) increased norepinephrine levels (P< 0.01
) transiently (2-4 h), In contrast, administration of NGITS (n = 22) d
id not increase norepinephrine levels and even induced a slight but si
gnificant decrease in norepinephrine levels 5-6 h after chronic treatm
ents. Although administration of amlodipine (n = 22) did not increase
norepinephrine levels transiently either after acute or after chronic
administration, it did induce a sustained rise in basal norepinephrine
levels by more than 50% after chronic therapy (P < 0.01). Plasma epin
ephrine levels were not increased by any of the treatments and even a
slight decrease was observed 4 h after administration of a dose follow
ing chronic treatments with NGITS and amlodipine (P < 0.05). Conclusio
ns The transient increase in norepinephrine levels observed with NPA a
nd the sustained increases in norepinephrine levels observed after chr
onic treatment with amlodipine suggest that sympathetic activation occ
urs with those two drugs. The lack of increase in norepinephrine level
s after administration of NGITS suggests that this formulation does no
t activate the sympathetic system. The lowering of epinephrine levels
after administrations of NGITS and amlodipine suggests that inhibition
of release of epinephrine by the adrenal medulla occurs with longer-a
cting dihydropyridine formulations. J Hypertens 16:1357-1369 (C) 1998
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.