Aa. Garcia et al., PHASE-I AND PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDY OF ESTRAMUSTINE PHOSPHATE AND SHORTINFUSIONS OF PACLITAXEL IN WOMEN WITH SOLID TUMORS, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(9), 1998, pp. 2959-2963
Purpose: We sought to determine the tolerance of estramustine phosphat
e (EMP) combined with a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in women with solid
paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. paclitaxel pharmacology was to be
studied at the recommended phase II dose. Patients and Methods: Pacli
taxel was administered to cohorts of at least three assessable patient
s at doses of 150, 180, 210, and 225 mg/m(2), while EMP was given at 9
00 and 1,200 mg/m(2)/d in divided doses orally for 2 days preceding an
d on the day of paclitaxel. The pharmacologic study was performed at 2
25 mg/m(2) paclitaxel given in the absence and 3 weeks later in the pr
esence of EMP 900 mg/m(2)/d. Results: Thirty-eight patients received a
total of 178 courses. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were com
mon at EMP 1,200 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2); this was consider
ed the maximum-tolerated dose. Since these toxicities appeared related
to EMP, the pharmacologic study used a dose of 900 mg/m(2) of this ag
ent with 225 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. Antitumor activity was documented aga
inst breast and ovarian cancers at all levels. Paclitaxel pharmacokine
tics without and with EMP did not differ. Conclusion: EMP 900 mg/m(2)
for 3 days and 225 mg/m(2) paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion are well tole
rated; antitumor activity was seen in women with paclitaxel-pretreated
solid tumors. This apparent enhancement of antitumor effects is unlik
ely to be mediated by P-glycoprotein. J Clin Oncol 16:2959-2963. (C) 1
998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.