Ninety-six patients were entered into a randomised, double-blind, doub
le-dummy, clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of fadrozol
e as compared to megestrol acetate as second-line hormonal treatment f
or patients with advanced breast cancer. Analysis of results was on an
intention-to-treat basis and included response rate, time to progress
ion (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF) and survival. Forty-six pat
ients received fadrozole and 50 were randomised to megestrol acetate.
Patients and pretreatment prognostic variables were balanced in the tw
o arms of the trial. The objective response rates [3/46 (7 %) for fadr
ozole and 3/50 (6 %) for megestrol acetate], TTP, TTF and survival wer
e similar in the two arms of the trial. Toxicity was also similar in t
he two arms of the trial and consisted mainly of oedema, hypertension
and minor gastrointestinal symptoms. Fadrozole appears to be as active
as megestrol acetate in second-line hormonal treatment of advanced br
east cancer.