G. Derumeaux et al., LEFT-VENTRICULAR ISOVOLUMIC RELAXATION BLOOD-FLOW IN CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION PATIENTS - VALUE IN NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE REJECTION, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 91(6), 1998, pp. 731-738
The aim of this study was to assess a Doppler-echocardiographic parame
ter which has not been previously reported for the diagnosis of acute
cardiac rejection. The parameter was left ventricular isovolumic relax
ation blood flow. Eighty patients who had undergone orthoptic cardiac
transplantation were followed up regularly with echocardiography for a
period of 2 years. In all, 495 echocardiographic studies were perform
ed and the results compared with those of endomyocardial biopsy perfor
med on the same day (11.4 echocardiographic studies per patient). In t
he absence of cardiac rejection, isovolumic relaxation Doppler signal
was recorded in all patients (364/387 echo studies). This was a positi
ve signal directed towards the apex detected by continuous mode Dopple
r in the apical position, arising along the interventricular septum in
the mid part of the left ventricle (82 % of cases) or from the basal
region of the septum (18 % of cases) and lasting throughout the phase
of isovolumic relaxation. The maximal velocity was 0.53 +/- 0.08 m/s (
range 0.32 to 0.73 m/s) : the velocity-time integral was 34 +/- 33 cm.
This signal was associated with medioventricular endosystolic acceler
ation of blood flow in 75 % of cases. The incidence of the isovolumic
relaxation flow signal decreased in cardiac rejection with no signific
ant changes in the other usual Doppler-echocardiographic parameters ex
cept for a significant decrease in the ejection fraction in the group
with severe rejection. In the group with mild rejection (n = 89) an is
ovolumic relaxation flow signal was only observed in 52 cases (includi
ng 29 in whom immunosuppressive treatment was not increased). In patie
nts with moderate rejection (n = 12) there were only 5 cases in which
a isovolumic relaxation flow signal was recorded, and in the group wit
h severe rejection (n = 7), the signal could only be recorded in 1 cas
e. The authors conclude that the absence of an isovolumic relaxation b
lood flow signal in a cardiac transplant patient is a reliable sign of
cardiac rejection with an excellent specificity (94 %). The absence o
f this signal is a sensitive indicator of severe rejection (86 %) but
less so for moderate (58 %) or mild rejection (42 %).