LEFT-VENTRICULAR ISOVOLUMIC RELAXATION BLOOD-FLOW IN CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION PATIENTS - VALUE IN NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE REJECTION

Citation
G. Derumeaux et al., LEFT-VENTRICULAR ISOVOLUMIC RELAXATION BLOOD-FLOW IN CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION PATIENTS - VALUE IN NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE REJECTION, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 91(6), 1998, pp. 731-738
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System","Peripheal Vascular Diseas
ISSN journal
00039683
Volume
91
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
731 - 738
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9683(1998)91:6<731:LIRBIC>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess a Doppler-echocardiographic parame ter which has not been previously reported for the diagnosis of acute cardiac rejection. The parameter was left ventricular isovolumic relax ation blood flow. Eighty patients who had undergone orthoptic cardiac transplantation were followed up regularly with echocardiography for a period of 2 years. In all, 495 echocardiographic studies were perform ed and the results compared with those of endomyocardial biopsy perfor med on the same day (11.4 echocardiographic studies per patient). In t he absence of cardiac rejection, isovolumic relaxation Doppler signal was recorded in all patients (364/387 echo studies). This was a positi ve signal directed towards the apex detected by continuous mode Dopple r in the apical position, arising along the interventricular septum in the mid part of the left ventricle (82 % of cases) or from the basal region of the septum (18 % of cases) and lasting throughout the phase of isovolumic relaxation. The maximal velocity was 0.53 +/- 0.08 m/s ( range 0.32 to 0.73 m/s) : the velocity-time integral was 34 +/- 33 cm. This signal was associated with medioventricular endosystolic acceler ation of blood flow in 75 % of cases. The incidence of the isovolumic relaxation flow signal decreased in cardiac rejection with no signific ant changes in the other usual Doppler-echocardiographic parameters ex cept for a significant decrease in the ejection fraction in the group with severe rejection. In the group with mild rejection (n = 89) an is ovolumic relaxation flow signal was only observed in 52 cases (includi ng 29 in whom immunosuppressive treatment was not increased). In patie nts with moderate rejection (n = 12) there were only 5 cases in which a isovolumic relaxation flow signal was recorded, and in the group wit h severe rejection (n = 7), the signal could only be recorded in 1 cas e. The authors conclude that the absence of an isovolumic relaxation b lood flow signal in a cardiac transplant patient is a reliable sign of cardiac rejection with an excellent specificity (94 %). The absence o f this signal is a sensitive indicator of severe rejection (86 %) but less so for moderate (58 %) or mild rejection (42 %).