Lb. Alloy et Cm. Clements, HOPELESSNESS THEORY OF DEPRESSION - TESTS OF THE SYMPTOM COMPONENT, Cognitive therapy and research, 22(4), 1998, pp. 303-335
This study used a short-term prospective design in an unselected sampl
e of undergraduates to test five hypotheses derived from the symptom c
omponent of the hopelessness theory of depression (Abramson, Meta[sky,
& Alloy 1989). In congruence with hopelessness theory, hopelessness w
as uniquely associated both concurrently and prospectively with sympto
ms of depression but nor anxiety. The hypothesized hopelessness depres
sion symptoms correlated with one another more highly than they correl
ated with other depressive symptoms nor hypothesized to be part of hop
elessness depression or with symptoms of other psychopathology. Hopele
ssness predicted prospectively four of the eight symptoms hypothesized
to be part of the hopelessness depression symptom profile and showed
a trend (p < .05) to predict an additional two hopelessness depression
symptoms. Hopelessness did nor predict any nonhopelessness depression
symptoms or any symptoms of anxiety disorders (somatic anxiety, phobi
as, obsessions/compulsions). In addition, the attributional diathesis-
stress interaction featured in the theory predicted hopelessness depre
ssion symptoms prospectively and specifically, and was mediated by hop
elessness. However; at odds with the theory, hopelessness failed to pr
edict two of the symptoms (sadness, low energy) hypothesized to be par
t of hopelessness depression anal it did predict some symptoms of othe
r psychopathology, primarily psychoticism, and, marginally, hostility
and paranoia.