Whether the loss of visibility due to measurement in two-slit interfer
ence patterns can always be attributed to momentum transfer depends up
on how one defines the last term. The momentum transfer to a quantum p
article can be determined unambiguously if it was initially in a momen
tum eigenstate, but that is not the state relevant to a two-slit exper
iment. A sensible answer for the two-slit problem was obtained by Wise
man ct nl. [Phys. Rev. A 56, 944 (1997)] using the formalism of the Wi
gner function. Here I show that a more general answer can be obtained
using the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics, in which particles
have a definite position and momentum at all times. By following all
possible trajectories of the particle it is possible to calculate the
probability distribution P-total(B)(p') for it to receive a momentum t
ransfer p' as a result of the measurement. Furthermore, the 1-norm of
this distribution obeys the relation [\p'\](total)(B)d greater than or
equal to 2 (h) over bar(1 - V)/pi, where V is the visibility of the i
nterference pattern and d is the slit separation. This confirms that t
he momentum transfer in a welcher Weg (which path) experiment is in ac
cord with the uncertainty principle. Like the Wignerian analysis, the
Bohmian analysis clearly distinguishes between a local momentum transf
er (which occurs even if the particle is localized at a single slit) a
nd a nonlocal momentum transfer (which occurs only if the particle is
delocalized, at both slits). In the Bohmian analysis the former occurs
at the time of the measurement, while the latter occurs after the mea
surement, and is a consequence of Bohm's ''quantum potential.''