A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MANUAL AND AUTOMATED RENAL BIOPSIES

Citation
D. Kim et al., A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MANUAL AND AUTOMATED RENAL BIOPSIES, American journal of kidney diseases, 32(3), 1998, pp. 426-431
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
ISSN journal
02726386
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
426 - 431
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-6386(1998)32:3<426:ARPCOM>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
A percutaneous renal biopsy can be performed in several ways, includin g using a spring-loaded biopsy gun. As this form of renal biopsy has b ecome more popular, a controversy has developed regarding tissue adequ acy and the incidence of complications. To compare these two aspects i n an automated biopsy and a manual biopsy, we studied 166 patients ass igned to one of the two renal biopsy methods. In a randomized, prospec tive manner from June 1994 until February 1997, group 1 (67 patients) received a 14 G Tru-cut needle (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) manual biopsy w hile group 2 (99 patients) received an 18 G automated gun biopsy. Ther e was no difference in sex, age, hemoglobin level, prothrombin time, p artial thromboplastin time, or diastolic and systolic blood pressure p rebiopsy in groups I and II. Indications for biopsy were proteinuria ( 38%), proteinuria accompanied by hematuria (31.3%), acute renal failur e (9.6%), lupus nephropathy (9.6%), chronic renal failure (6%), and he maturia only (5.4%). In group I, the number of cores was 1.88 +/- 0.56 , the glomeruli obtained were 27.3 +/- 13.8, and the number of glomeru li per core were 15.3 +/- 8.4. In group II, the values were 2.37 +/- 0 .88, 20.7 +/- 11.1,and 9.95 +/- 6.9, respectively. These results showe d a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In all cases, pat hological diagnosis was possible. The histology showed IgA nephropathy in 25.9%, minimal change disease in 16.3%, lupus nephritis in 11.4%, membranous glomerulonephropathy in 9.3%, membranoproliferative glomeru lonephritis in 5.4%, and others. The incidence of postbiopsy hematoma was marginally greater in group I (22.3% v 11.1%) and the area of peri renal hematoma shown on ultrasound 24 hours postbiopsy was larger in g roup I, as well (848 +/- 623 mm(2) v 338 +/- 260 mm(2)). Hematocrit le vels before and after biopsy showed a significant difference (34.9% +/ - 7.9% and 34.0% +/- 7.6%, respectively; P < 0.05) In group I, but no significant difference was observed in group II (35.1% +/- 7.0% and 34 .7% +/- 6.9%). Both techniques rendered adequate tissue sampling, but the extent of bleeding was more severe with the manual 14 G Tru-cut ne edle biopsy. (C) 1998 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.