Sj. Skehan et al., A COMPARISON OF A NONIONIC DIMER, IODIXANOL WITH A NONIONIC MONOMER, IOHEXOL IN LOW-DOSE INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY, British journal of radiology, 71(849), 1998, pp. 910-917
A prospective, double-blind study of 392 patients randomized into four
groups was performed to establish whether diagnostic intravenous urog
rams could be obtained with a lower dose of iodine when using the dime
ric, non-ionic contrast medium iodixanol compared with the monomeric,
non-ionic iohexol. Patients received iodixanol or iohexol containing e
ither 9 or 12 g of iodine (gI). The primary parameter was the diagnost
ic quality of the 6 min film, assessed in a blinded fashion, by consen
sus, by four radiologists. Iodixanol at both doses was diagnostic in o
ver 90% of cases. Iohexol was only diagnostic in 74% (9 gI) and 81.8%
(12 gI). Pairwise comparisons revealed that iodixanol 9 gI was signifi
cantly better than both iohexol 9 gI (p = 0.0005) and 12 gI (p = 0.014
). No significant difference was present for different doses within th
e same contrast medium group. Iodixanol resulted in poorer bladder dis
tension than iohexol. Iodixanol caused significantly less discomfort t
han iohexol.