COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF DIMERIC AND MONOMERIC NONIONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA (IODIXANOL VS IOPROMIDE) IN UROGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY
F. Stacul et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF DIMERIC AND MONOMERIC NONIONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA (IODIXANOL VS IOPROMIDE) IN UROGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY, British journal of radiology, 71(849), 1998, pp. 918-922
Non-ionic dimers induce less diuresis than non-ionic monomers, resulti
ng in increased opacification of the urinary tract in intravenous (iv)
urography. This double blind, comparative, randomized, parallel trial
compared the efficacy of iodixanol (non-ionic dimer) and iopromide (n
on-ionic monomer) in 100 patients with mild to moderate renal insuffic
iency (serum creatinine of 135 to 265 mu mol l(-1)) who underwent iv u
rography. A total dose of 600 mgI kg(-1) bw of iodixanol (320 mgI ml(-
1)) or iopromide (300 mgI ml(-1)) was injected. Radiographs were blind
ly evaluated by three radiologists who analysed different parameters (
renal border visualization, nephrogram density, calyceal filling and d
ensity, papillary blush detection, delineation of collecting ducts, re
nal pelvis opacification, visualization of ureters, bladder density, b
ladder distention). Densitometric evaluation on the renal pelvis and b
ladder was also performed. Iodixanol showed better filling and density
of the calyces (p = 0.004), more frequent detection of papillary blus
h (p = 0.003) and better opacification of the renal pelvis (p = 0.006)
. No significant differences between the two contrast media were found
in regard to other parameters. In conclusion, the results confirmed t
heoretical expectations. The non-ionic dimer iodixanol is to be prefer
red to a non-ionic monomer such as iopromide in iv urography on patien
ts with impaired renal function.