GROUND REACTION FORCES AND EMG ACTIVITY WITH ANKLE BRACING DURING INVERSION STRESS

Citation
Ml. Cordova et al., GROUND REACTION FORCES AND EMG ACTIVITY WITH ANKLE BRACING DURING INVERSION STRESS, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 30(9), 1998, pp. 1363-1370
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Sport Sciences
ISSN journal
01959131
Volume
30
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1363 - 1370
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(1998)30:9<1363:GRFAEA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of external ankle support on ground reaction forces and myoelectrical activity of selected lower extremity muscles during dynamic inversion stress. Methods: Twenty-four healthy males performed five trials of a lateral dynamic movement at a rate between 80-90% of their maximal sp eed under three ankle brace conditions (no brace-control, Aircast Spor t-Stirrup, Active Ankle). Ground reaction forces along the mediolatera l axis and EMG activity of the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and medial gastrocnemius were simultaneously recorded during force plate contact. Results: Ankle bracing did not affect peak impact force (P > 0.05), maximum loading force (P > 0.05), or peak propulsion force (P > 0.05) in the lateral direction compared with the control condition. A nkle bracing reduced the EMG activity of the peroneus longus during pe ak impact force compared with the control condition (P < 0.05), althou gh no differences were noted between the two braces. Furthermore, pero neous longus activity during maximum loading force and peak propulsion remained unaffected (P < 0.05). Ankle bracing did not affect the EMG activity of the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius at the poin t of peak impact force, maximum loading force (P > 0.05), and peak pro pulsion force (P > 0.05). Conclusions: These data suggest that ankle b racing may not affect the forces experienced at the foot and ankle, bu r helps reduce the strain placed on the peroneus longus during peak im pact force. Furthermore, ankle bracing does not alter the function of the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius during dynamic inversio n stress.