Ml. Cordova et al., GROUND REACTION FORCES AND EMG ACTIVITY WITH ANKLE BRACING DURING INVERSION STRESS, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 30(9), 1998, pp. 1363-1370
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects
of external ankle support on ground reaction forces and myoelectrical
activity of selected lower extremity muscles during dynamic inversion
stress. Methods: Twenty-four healthy males performed five trials of a
lateral dynamic movement at a rate between 80-90% of their maximal sp
eed under three ankle brace conditions (no brace-control, Aircast Spor
t-Stirrup, Active Ankle). Ground reaction forces along the mediolatera
l axis and EMG activity of the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and
medial gastrocnemius were simultaneously recorded during force plate
contact. Results: Ankle bracing did not affect peak impact force (P >
0.05), maximum loading force (P > 0.05), or peak propulsion force (P >
0.05) in the lateral direction compared with the control condition. A
nkle bracing reduced the EMG activity of the peroneus longus during pe
ak impact force compared with the control condition (P < 0.05), althou
gh no differences were noted between the two braces. Furthermore, pero
neous longus activity during maximum loading force and peak propulsion
remained unaffected (P < 0.05). Ankle bracing did not affect the EMG
activity of the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius at the poin
t of peak impact force, maximum loading force (P > 0.05), and peak pro
pulsion force (P > 0.05). Conclusions: These data suggest that ankle b
racing may not affect the forces experienced at the foot and ankle, bu
r helps reduce the strain placed on the peroneus longus during peak im
pact force. Furthermore, ankle bracing does not alter the function of
the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius during dynamic inversio
n stress.