CELLULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING 2 MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR-MEDIATED DEPOLARIZING RESPONSES IN RELAY CELLS OF THE RAT LATERAL GENICULATE-NUCLEUS

Authors
Citation
Jj. Zhu et Dj. Uhlrich, CELLULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING 2 MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR-MEDIATED DEPOLARIZING RESPONSES IN RELAY CELLS OF THE RAT LATERAL GENICULATE-NUCLEUS, Neuroscience, 87(4), 1998, pp. 767-781
Citations number
69
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
03064522
Volume
87
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
767 - 781
Database
ISI
SICI code
0306-4522(1998)87:4<767:CMU2MR>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
We used the whole-cell recording technique in an in vitro preparation to examine the electrophysiological actions of the muscarinic receptor s on relay cells in the rat lateral geniculate nucleus. Drop applicati on of the muscarinic agonist acetyl-beta-methylcholine resulted in a s low depolarization that persisted for several minutes. The response wa s insensitive to the nicotinic antagonist hexamethonium. but was block ed by atropine, a muscarinic antagonist. The response was also insensi tive to blockade of synaptic transmission by tetrodotoxin, indicating a direct muscarinic effect. The muscarinic depolarization consisted of two components that were somewhat separated in time. The early portio n of the muscarinic response was mediated by a large inward current wi th little change in input resistance, while the later portion was medi ated by a small inward current associated with a large increase in inp ut resistance. Pharmacological agents were used to distinguish the two components. Drop application of McN-A-343, an m1 receptor agonist, co uld only mimic the later component of the muscarinic response. This wa s supported by the result that the later component was blocked by low concentrations of pirenzepine. These data suggest that the m1 receptor only mediates the late component of the muscarinic response, while th e early component is mainly mediated by the m3 receptor. The idea that both m1 and m3 receptors were involved in the muscarinic depolarizati on was further supported by voltage-clamp analysis. This revealed that activation of the m1 receptor was associated with a decrease in an in ward potassium current, I-Kleak, while activation of the m3 receptor w as likely associated with both a decrease in I-Kleak and an increase i n the hyperpolarization-activated cation current I-h. In summary, our data suggest that muscarinic responses in geniculate relay cells resul t from the activation of two receptors, which modulate I-Kleak and I-h . Given the fact that the ascending aminergic systems also depolarize geniculate relay cells via two receptors acting on I-Kleak and I-h, we concluded that ascending activating systems use common mechanisms to enact the depolarizing form of arousal in relay neurons. (C) 1998 IBRO . Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.