THE FALSE-NEGATIVE MAMMOGRAM

Citation
Pt. Huynh et al., THE FALSE-NEGATIVE MAMMOGRAM, Radiographics, 18(5), 1998, pp. 1137-1154
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
02715333
Volume
18
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1137 - 1154
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-5333(1998)18:5<1137:>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
In general, failure to detect or correctly characterize breast cancer can be attributed to one of four main factors: inherent limitations of screen-film mammography, inadequate radiographic technique, subtle or unusual lesion characteristics, and interpretation error. The restric ted latitude and display contrast of screen-film mammography are among the significant factors that result in decreased visualization of bre ast tumors and microcalcifications in patients with dense fibroglandul ar tissue. Unlike the inherent limitations of screen-film mammography, a poor radiographic technique can be improved on and should be elimin ated. Crucial components of a well-performed mammographic examination are correct positioning, adequate compression, and proper image exposu re. Lesion characteristics that may lead to a false-negative mammogram include small size, a site where visualization is difficult, visualiz ation on only one view, a benign or probably benign appearance, lack o f a desmoplastic reaction, and slow or no apparent growth. Causes of i nterpretation error include suboptimal viewing conditions, outside dis tractions, lack of a systematic approach, oversight of a subtle lesion because of an obvious finding, lack of knowledge of clinical findings , imprecise correlation with results of other studies, and nonbelief. Recognition of these various factors should help decrease the rate of false-negative mammograms.