The effects of sensor selection and sensor blending on the cardiovascu
lar response to graded exercise was evaluated in 10 patients (age 74 /- 2 yrs; 7 men and 3 women) implanted with a dual sensor rate adaptiv
e VVIR pacemaker (Vitatron Topaz(TM) model 515). Patients underwent th
ree graded exercise tests (GXT) with sensor programming randomly assig
ned. For a given graded exercise test the pacemaker was programmed int
o activity sensing (ACT), QT sensing, or dual sensing (ACT = QT). Data
were recorded at rest and during each stage of the graded exercise te
xt. Oxygen uptake (VO2) was measured continuously using a Q Plex I sys
tem. Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (Qc) were
measured by impedance cardiography. Systolic time intervals were calc
ulated from simultaneous recordings of the EGG, phonocardiogram, and t
he impedance cardiogram. in response to the GXT no differences in peak
VO2 were observed across the three sensor settings. Regardless of the
sensor setting Qc increased linearly with each increment in VO2. The
HR response to ACT only pacing was significantly higher than in the ot
her two pacing conditions. During ACT only pacing SV failed to rise in
response to exercise. The increased exercise Qc during QT and ACT = Q
T pacing were mediated by significant increases in both HR and Sir. Th
e QT and dual pacing conditions were also associated with longer diast
olic filling times. The data indicate that the mechanisms responsible
for the increase Qc during exercise were different for ACT versus ACT
= QT or QT sensor-driven pacing.