TOP-DOWN VERSUS BOTTOM-UP AND THE RURITANIAN BEAN BUG

Citation
Mp. Hassell et al., TOP-DOWN VERSUS BOTTOM-UP AND THE RURITANIAN BEAN BUG, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 95(18), 1998, pp. 10661-10664
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary Sciences
ISSN journal
00278424
Volume
95
Issue
18
Year of publication
1998
Pages
10661 - 10664
Database
ISI
SICI code
0027-8424(1998)95:18<10661:TVBATR>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
a recent article, Hunter uses the late George Varley and George Gradwe ll's long-term data on the winter moth (Operophtera brumata) and green tortrix (Tortrix viridana) populations to propose a method of quantif ying the relative importance of top-down effects (because of natural e nemies) and bottom-up effects (because of resource competition) in inf luencing population dynamics. We believe this approach is deeply flawe d. Using Varley and Gradwell's winter moth study, we show that the pro blems with Hunter's analysis lie in his misinterpretation of the popul ation dynamics and his inappropriate use of statistical techniques. We also emphasize the importance of distinguishing clearly between two q uite different things: firstly, top-down and bottom-up regulation of p opulations and secondly, the much simpler task of categorizing factors affecting changes in population density as either top-down or bottom up processes.