COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF THE LEDERLE TAKEDA ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS COMPONENT DTP (DTAP) VACCINE AND LEDERLE WHOLE-CELL COMPONENT DTP VACCINE INGERMAN CHILDREN AFTER HOUSEHOLD EXPOSURE/
U. Heininger et al., COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF THE LEDERLE TAKEDA ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS COMPONENT DTP (DTAP) VACCINE AND LEDERLE WHOLE-CELL COMPONENT DTP VACCINE INGERMAN CHILDREN AFTER HOUSEHOLD EXPOSURE/, Pediatrics (Evanston), 102(3), 1998, pp. 546-553
Background. A household contact sub-study was performed as part of a p
rospective, cohort pertussis vaccine efficacy trial in Germany. Design
. Infants received four doses of either the Lederle/Takeda acellular p
ertussis component diphtheria-tetanus toxoids (DTP) vaccine (DTaP) or
Lederle whole-cell component DTP vaccine at 3, 4.5, 6, and 15 to 18 mo
nths of age (Wyeth-Lederle Vaccines and Pediatrics, Pearl River, NY).
An open control group received three doses of diphtheria and tetanus t
oxoids vaccine (DT) at 3, 4.5, and 15 to 18 months of age. Vaccine eff
icacy rates were calculated using a number of principal and ancillary
case definitions for primary, secondary, and noncases by analyzing sec
ondary attack rates in study infants after exposure to pertussis in th
e household using 7- to 28- and 7- to 42-day postexposure observation
periods and the inclusion and the exclusion of noncases who received m
acrolide antibiotics or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole during the expos
ure period. Results. During a 3.5-year study period, 10 271 infants (D
TP or DTaP, n = 8532; DT, n = 1739) were enrolled and actively followe
d along with all household members for cough illnesses. Depending on t
he case definition, 160 to 519 household exposures to pertussis were i
dentified. In general, secondary attack rates in DT recipients were lo
w and this was primarily because of the frequent use of antimicrobial
prophylaxis. Using the principal case definitions and the exclusion of
noncases who received macrolide antibiotics or trimethoprim-sulfameth
oxazole during the exposure period and the 7- to 42-day observation pe
riod, the efficacy of DTP against cough illness of greater than or equ
al to 7 days duration caused by Bordetella pertussis was 84% (95% conf
idence interval [CI] = 65-93) and that of DTaP was 58% (95% CI = 30-75
). Using similar criteria, the efficacy against typical pertussis (gre
ater than or equal to 21 days of cough with either paroxysms, whoop, o
r posttussive vomiting) was 94% (95% CI = 77-99) and 86% (95% CI = 62-
95) for DTP and DTaP, respectively. The efficacy against any cough ill
ness (with or without) laboratory confirmation was 54% (95% CI = 32-69
) and 38% (95% CI = 13-56) for DTP and DTaP, respectively. Conclusion.
This household contact substudy within our cohort study, with active
investigator-generated surveillance, was a severe test of vaccine effi
cacy. Both vaccines (DTP and DTaP) are better at preventing typical pe
rtussis than mild illness. When case definitions similar to those in o
ther recent trials are used, the Lederle/Takeda vaccine has an efficac
y similar to other multicomponent DTaP vaccines.