R. Perez et al., USE OF A FOCUSED TEEN PRENATAL CLINIC AT A MILITARY TEACHING HOSPITAL- MODEL FOR IMPROVED OUTCOMES OF UNMARRIED MOTHERS, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 38(3), 1998, pp. 280-283
We evaluated the utility of a focussed, multidisciplinary adolescent c
linic in improving perinatal outcomes. The study population included a
ll delivering unmarried teenagers (13-19 years) from January 1, 1993 t
o December 31, 1995 attending the focussed adolescent obstetrical clin
ic compared to a similar cohort of married teenagers (13-19 years), ma
rried 20-24 year-old patients, and unmarried 20-24 year-old patients.
There were no statistical differences in chorioamnionitis, intrauterin
e growth retardation (IUGR), postpartum haemorrhage, maternal weight g
ain, mean gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery rates (<37 wee
ks), low birthweight (<2,500 g), Caesarean delivery, postterm delivery
rates (>41 weeks), macrosomia (>4,000 g), placental abruption, chroni
c hypertension, alcohol use, Apgar scores or stillbirth rates or neona
tal death rates among the 3 groups studied. Statistical differences we
re noted in mean delivery weights (p<0.05), preeclampsia (p<0.004), ge
stational diabetes (p<0.01), history of substance abuse (p<0.0001), to
bacco use (p<0.0001), and forceps delivery rates (p<0.004). However, i
n the teen cohort none of these differences appeared to adversely affe
ct perinatal outcomes in our patients. The focussed, adolescent obstet
rical clinic appears to provide perinatal morbidities equal to a low-r
isk, general population generating better than expected outcomes for p
regnant teenagers.