Using postwar Japanese asset market data, this communication demonstra
tes how well three different types of stochastic discount factors perf
orm in accounting for the predictable components of financial returns
or their serial correlations. When the three are compared, the prefere
nce with subsistence expenditure works best to describe stock markets.
This result is in contrast to some existing findings that risk-neutra
l or near-risk-neutral behavior is a proper characterization of Japane
se stock markets. On the other hand, none of the three specifications
succeeds in describing land or money markets. The inability to explain
these three markets consistently is a principal source of the failure
of empirical tests which are based on the unconditional moment condit
ions imposed by the CCAPM. (C) 1998 Academic Press.