Kj. Prager et D. Buhrmester, INTIMACY AND NEED FULFILLMENT IN COUPLE RELATIONSHIPS, Journal of social and personal relationships, 15(4), 1998, pp. 435-469
Two studies were conducted to explore the following questions: (i) doe
s intimacy, within the context of a couple relationship, contribute to
individual need fulfillment?; (ii) does self-disclosure have benefici
al effects on need fulfillment without being accompanied by intimacy's
others dimensions: positive affective tone and partner listening and
understanding?; and (iii) does intimacy's impact on need fulfillment m
ediate its relationship with physical and psychological wellbeing? For
the first study, 154 commuter university students completed questionn
aire measures of well-being and the Need Fulfillment Inventory (NFI),
a new paper-and-pencil test that assesses the agentic and communal dim
ensions of need fulfillment. Results from study 1 showed positive corr
elations between both agentic and communal need fulfillment and well-b
eing. For the second study, 133 cohabiting couples were asked to compl
ete the NFI, two measures of relational intimacy, five measures of wel
l-being, and to keep a daily record of their interactions for a week.
Factor analyses of the daily record data revealed three dimensions of
verbally intimate interaction: positive affective tone, daily self-dis
closure, and listening and understanding. Results supported the notion
that relational intimacy, assessed globally and as a characteristic o
f the couples' daily interactions, is positively associated with indiv
idual need fulfillment. Self-disclosure's impact on need fulfillment w
as found to vary as a function of the other dimensions of intimacy pre
sent in the interactions. The pattern of moderation between self-discl
osure and other dimensions of intimacy was not exactly as predicted, h
owever; sometimes, self-disclosure may soften the detrimental effects
of negative interactions on need fulfillment. Finally, the mediational
hypothesis was mostly supported, which indicates that intimacy's rela
tionship to psychological well-being is most likely accounted for by i
ts effects on individual need fulfillment. Need fulfillment did not fu
lly mediate the relationship between intimacy and depressive symptoms.