A valid substitute for CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) for the product
ion oi rigid polyurethane foams for thermal insulating materials, with
blowing agents having low environmental impact, is nor available yet.
HCFC-141b and n-pentane, at present the most utilized physical blowin
g agents (PBAs), cannot definitely replace CFCs because of their envir
onmental impact and flammability, respectively. The aim of the present
work is to investigate the opportunity of employing HCOOH as a chemic
al blowing agent (CBA). other than water, which can in some applicatio
ns replace physical blowing agents. Advantages and disadvantages have
been highlighted after studying the isocyanate-formic acid reaction. E
vidently, the introduction of new reactions into the polyurethane chem
istry introduces a wide range of opportunities and challenges. (C) 199
8 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.