Reviewing the literature the revision arthroplasty of the hip joint wi
th acetabular reinforcement rings shows good results concerning a foll
ow-up period of six years in comparison with cemented or non-cemented
primary implants. We use different acetabular reinforcement rings with
differentiated indications. The primary assignment is the secure fixa
tion of the ring to the vital bone. The acetabular bone defect is fill
ed with autogenous or homogenous bone grafts. The increasing number of
massive acetabular defects made us develop a new acetabular reinforce
ment ring. It allows a better fixation than the Burch-Schneider Ring a
nd is cheaper than the individual acetabular implant. Since 1988 we pe
rformed 262 revision arthroplasty with acetabular reinforcement rings.
Until 1996 we evaluated 174 reinforcement rings (41 Muller rings, 72
Ganz rings, 41 Burch-Schneider rings, 6 RS or RSH rings, 5 individual
acetabular implants). After an average follow-up period of 5,6 years a
radiological or clinical loosening of the acetabular component occurr
ed in only 6 patients (3,4%). To reach a better comparison of the surg
ical results we developed a score, which differentiately checks the op
erative goals. On plane pelvic radiographs we checked the reconstructi
on of the rotationcenter, the demarcation of the acetabular component
and the outcome of the bone transplant.