T. Smithsivertsen et al., URINARY NICKEL EXCRETION IN POPULATIONS LIVING IN THE PROXIMITY OF 2 RUSSIAN NICKEL REFINERIES - A NORWEGIAN-RUSSIAN POPULATION-BASED STUDY, Environmental health perspectives, 106(8), 1998, pp. 503-511
The Russian nickel refineries located in the cities of Nikel and Zapol
yarny close to the Norwegian border are responsible for extensive sulf
ur dioxide and nickel pollution, as well as severe ecological damage i
n both countries. The aim of our study was to investigate human nickel
exposure in the populations living on both sides of the Norwegian-Rus
sian border. The design was a cross-sectional population-based study o
f adults aged 18-69 years residing in Sor-Varanger municipality, Norwa
y and Nikel and Zapolyarny, Russia, during 1994 and 1995. Individual e
xposure to nickel was assessed by measurements of nickel in urine usin
g electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. For controls, urine w
as collected from adults in the Russian cities of Apatity and Umba (Ko
la Peninsula) and the Norwegian city of Tromso, all of which are locat
ions without nearby point sources of nickel. Altogether 2,233 urine sp
ecimens were analysed for nickel. People living in Nikel had the highe
st concentrations (median 3.4 mu g/l), followed by Umba (median 2.7 mu
g/l), Zapolyarny (median 2.0 mu g/l), Apatity (median 1.9 mu g/l), Tr
omso (median 1.2 mu g/l), and Sor-Varanger (median 0.6 mu g/l). Regard
less of geographical location, the Russian study groups all had a high
er urinary-nickel average than those in Norway (p<0.001). With the exc
eption of Nikel, neither the Russian nor the Norwegian urinary-nickel
levels were associated with residence location near a Russian nickel r
efinery. We concluded that industrial nickel pollution alone could not
explain the observed discrepancy between Norway and Russia; we also d
iscuss other possible nickel exposure sources that may account for the
high urinary levels found in Russia.