N. Simberg et al., COMPARISON OF BUSERELIN AND NAFARELIN IN IVF CYCLES AND IN SUBSEQUENTFROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO-TRANSFER CYCLES, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 77(8), 1998, pp. 854-859
Objective. To compare two gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for
down-regulation prior to superovulation in in vitro fertilization/embr
yo transfer treatment. Methods. Infertility patients (n=181) were rand
omized to receive buserelin (1200 mu g/day, n=90) or nafarelin (800 mu
g/day, n=91) intranasally starting in the luteal phase. Serum levels
of LH, estradiol and progesterone were measured during the treatment.
The cycles were compared with regard to number of oocytes, fertilizati
on and implantation rates and achieved pregnancies. Results. Serum LH
was lower after two weeks on buserelin: 1.8 (1.3-2.4) IU/L (median, wi
th lower and upper quartile in parenthesis): than after nafarelin: 2.6
(1.8-4.0) IU/L, (p=0.0001). No other differences in serum hormone lev
els could be detected. More oocytes were recovered in the buserelin gr
oup: 13.0 (8.0-19.0) vs 11.0 (6.8-15.0), (p=0.046), but the fertilizat
ion rate was higher in the nafarelin group (49.9% vs 45.1%, p=0.023).
Implantation rate was higher in the nafarelin group (26.2% vs 15.5%, p
=0.030), but there were an equal number of deliveries in both groups (
20.9% vs 15.6% per started stimulation, p=0.420). In the subsequent fr
ozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles the implantation rate was 21.1% (na
farelin group) and 10.6% (buserelin group, p=0.067), the pregnancy rat
e/ET was 31.7% and 17.0% (p=0.107) and the delivery rate was 22.0% and
10.6% (p=0.148), respectively. Conclusions. Differences exist in IVF-
cycles down-regulated with buserelin or nafarelin which might affect e
mbryo quality and treatment outcome.