MAKING SAFETY 2ND-NATURE

Authors
Citation
Ta. Kletz, MAKING SAFETY 2ND-NATURE, Process safety progress, 17(3), 1998, pp. 196-199
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Chemical
Journal title
ISSN journal
10668527
Volume
17
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
196 - 199
Database
ISI
SICI code
1066-8527(1998)17:3<196:>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
From the 1960s onwards, the chemical and oil industries developed and used a number of new safety techniques which, in time, became second n ature to those who applied them. They included the use of QRA for deci ding priorities, Hazop and audits for identifying problems, inherently safer design for avoiding hazards, and more thorough investigation of incidents for identifying underlying causes. However, it has not yet become second nature to remember the accidents of the past and the act ions needed to prevent them happening again. I joined industry in 1944 and moved to production in 1952. Then, and for at least 15 years afte rwards, safety was a non-technical subject that could be left to arts graduates and elderly foremen. There was concern that people should no t be hurt-great attention was paid to the lost-time accident rate-but there was no realization, that it was a subject worthy of systematic s tudy by experienced technologists. This view changed at the end of the 1960s. A new generation of plants had been built, operating at higher temperatures and pressures and containing larger inventories of hazar dous chemicals; the result was a series of fires and explosions and a worsening fatal accident rate. Figure 1 shows the situation in ICI, at the time the UK's largest chemical company. Other companies experienc ed a similar state of affairs As a result in 1968, 1 was appointed one of the company's first technical safety advisers, an unusual appointm ent at the time for someone with my experience, and if the reason for my appointment had not been so obvious I would have wondered what I ha d done wrong. I and my colleagues tried to apply the same sort of syst ematic thinking to safety that we applied in our other professional wo rk. We developed some new concepts and techniques and adopted others. A common feature of our ideas, realized only in restrospect, was that they consisted Of more than mere problem-solving techniques. Once peop le had got used to these new concepts and used them a few times, they began to look at a whole range of problems in a different way.