R. Gillisamold et al., PARENTING ATTITUDES, FOSTER PARENTING ATTITUDES, AND MOTIVATIONS OF ADOPTIVE AND NONADOPTIVE FOSTER PARENT TRAINEES, Children and youth services review, 20(8), 1998, pp. 715-732
The purpose of this study was to examine attitudes and motivations of
adoptive and nonadoptive foster parent trainees toward parenting and f
oster parenting. Subjects were 44 adoptive female participants and 149
nonadoptive female trainees. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance reve
aled significant differences between adoptive and nonadoptive trainees
in parenting attitudes, foster parenting attitudes, and motivations f
or foster parenting. Inspection of adjusted means indicated that adopt
ive trainees had more positive attitudes toward parenting than nonadop
tive trainees on three parenting dimensions: inappropriate parental ex
pectations of children, parental value of physical punishment, and lac
k of empathy toward children's needs. Nonadoptive trainees had more po
sitive attitudes toward parenting than adoptive trainees on parent-chi
ld role reversal. Inspection of adjusted means for foster parenting at
titudes revealed that adoptive trainees identified more with the role
of foster parenting than did nonadoptive trainees, although nonadoptiv
e trainees had higher scores on foster parenting expectations than ado
ptive trainees. Inspection of adjusted means for motivations indicated
that adoptive trainees were more motivated than nonadoptive trainees
in four areas: rescuing a child, companionship for adult, replacing gr
own children, and companionship for own child. Nonadoptive trainees we
re more motivated by financial gain. One implication of these findings
is that these two groups may require different training curricula.