T. Nakatsuka et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION IN PHARYNGOESOPHAGEAL RECONSTRUCTION - RADIAL FOREARM FLAP COMPARED WITH JEJUNAL FLAP - A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery, 32(3), 1998, pp. 307-310
We reviewed 109 consecutive patients with cancer of the hypopharynx or
cervical oesophagus who underwent free flap transfer for immediate re
construction after total pharyngolaryngo-oesophagectomy. The free flap
s used were either free jejunal (n = 70) or radial forearm flaps (II =
39). Significantly more fistulas (3/70 compared with 15/39, p < 0.000
1) and strictures (6/64 compared with 13/33, p = 0.0008) developed in
the radial forearm than the jejunal flap group. However, functional do
nor site morbidity was minimal and there were no cases of total flap n
ecrosis in the forearm flap group. We consider that the free jejunal f
lap should be the first choice for total reconstruction of pharyngo-oe
sophageal defects. However, the forearm flap is suitable for elderly,
high risk patients, because it is less invasive and has minimal donor
site morbidity, which facilitates early recovery.