Xf. Wu et al., BENZO[A]PYRENE DIOL EPOXIDE AND BLEOMYCIN SENSITIVITY AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO CANCER OF UPPER AERODIGESTIVE TRACT, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(18), 1998, pp. 1393-1399
Background: Tobacco smoking is an established risk factor for cancers
of the upper aerodigestive tract, and measurement of chromosomal aberr
ations, i.e., chromatid breaks, induced in lymphocytes in vitro by ble
omycin has been shown to be a predictor of risk for these cancers. In
a case-control study, we recruited case subjects who were previously t
reated with surgery and/or radiotherapy for stage I or stage II squamo
us cell carcinoma of the head and neck to test the hypothesis that lym
phocytic chromatid breaks induced by benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE
), a tobacco mutagen, may also be associated with risk of developing c
ancers of the upper aerodigestive tract, Methods: Case subjects were m
atched to control subjects on the basis of age, sex, ethnicity, and sm
oking status. Primary lymphocytes from 67 case subjects and 81 control
subjects were treated with 2 mu M BPDE for 24 hours, and the frequenc
y of induced chromatid breaks was determined. All statistical tests we
re two-sided. Results: Lymphocytes from case subjects compared with ly
mphocytes from control subjects showed significantly more breaks per c
ell induced by BPDE (mean +/- standard deviation, 0.77 +/- 0.38 versus
0.49 +/- 0.25; P<.001), Lymphocytes from 64.2% of case subjects were
sensitive to BPDE (using a cutoff value of greater than or equal to 0.
60 break per cell), Subjects in the highest quartile of chromatid brea
ks had an approximately 20-fold increased risk of cancer compared with
those in the lowest quartile after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity
, and smoking status, The association between BPDE sensitivity and can
cer risk was higher in former smokers than in current smokers and high
er in younger patients than in older patients. Subjects with sensitivi
ty to both BPDE and bleomycin were at a 19.2-fold increased risk of ca
ncer compared with those who were not sensitive to either agent. Concl
usions: Mutagen sensitivity assays may aid in identifying individuals
at risk of cancer, and use of parallel assays with two mutagens may im
prove risk predictability.