Households typically have to decide on following the resources which t
hey control between individualized activities where there is common ac
cess. In this case, the ability to cooperate in the management of comm
on access resources determines the relative profitability of the two r
esource bundles, hence, affecting the allocation of resources held by
households to one or the other. The Mexican social sector is of this t
ype, with land under individual jurisdiction allocated to either crops
or pastures: the product of land in crops is privately appropriated,
while land in pastures is collectively grazed. We develop a model that
shows that, when cooperation fails in the management of collectively
grazed pastures, more land is allocated to crops than under successful
cooperation and less to pastures, while the stocking rate on pastures
is increased. This results in too much land in extensive crops and to
o many animals per hectare of pasture-a well-known observation for Mex
ico. This prediction is confirmed by analysis of data from a sample of
Mexican social sector households. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All
rights reserved.