The process of ovarian follicular development is a long and arduous on
e, marked by dramatic proliferation and differentiation of both the so
matic and germ cell elements. To a large extent, this explosive agenda
is under the control of conventional endocrine principles, involving
hormones such as pituitary gonadotropins and ovarian steroids. Importa
ntly, it has become increasingly apparent that several phenomena centr
al to ovarian physiology are not fully accounted for by conventional e
ndocrine principles. As an example, consideration must be given to the
process of follicular selection whereby a predetennined number of fol
licle(s) is recruited, selected, allowed to assert dominance? and ulti
mately ovulate despite the fact that all follicles are afforded compar
able gonadotropic stimulation. These observations have given rise to t
he suggestion that the regulation of ovarian function may be under the
control of yet another group of modulatory principles known under the
general term 'putative intra-ovarian regulators'. It is generally env
isioned that the exquisitely-timed and highly-regionalized expression
of these locally-derived, often peptidergic, principles may finally ac
count for those aspects of the ovarian life cycle which at this time d
efy conventional explanation. It has been hypothesized that the role o
f IGF-1 in the context of ovarian physiology is to serve as an amplifi
er of gonadotropin hormonal action. At this time, significant support
for this hypothesis can be documented. More speculative is the notion
that IGF-I may partake in intrafollicular intercompartmental coordinat
ion, a concept presupposing enhanced more coordinated follicular devel
opment, due to granulosa-theca-interstitial cell cross-talk and improv
ed coupling. Entirely in the speculative realm is the proposition that
IGF-1 may in fact partake in the process of follicular selection, a n
otion for which relatively limited support can be: derived at this tim
e. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.