Wt. Luke et al., A COMPARISON OF AIRBORNE AND SURFACE TRACE GAS MEASUREMENTS DURING THE SOUTHERN OXIDANTS STUDY (SOS), J GEO RES-A, 103(D17), 1998, pp. 22317-22337
The NOAA Twin Otter conducted more than a dozen overflights of ground-
level air quality monitoring stations during the 1995 Southern Oxidant
s Study (SOS) Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Project Field Intensive
. Surface and aircraft observations of ozone and ozone precursors were
examined to identify systematic sampling errors, and to assess the de
gree to which surface measurements may be considered representative of
the larger planetary boundary layer (PBL). Overall agreement between
surface and aircraft trace gas measurements was excellent in the well
developed mixed layer, especially in rural-regional background air and
under stagnant conditions, where surface concentrations change only s
lowly. On July 2, surface level measurements were representative of th
e larger mixed layer over distances as far as 70 km in background air,
and 30 km in the weakly advected urban plume. Vertical variations in
trace gas concentrations were often minimal in the well-mixed PBL, and
measurements at the surface always agreed well with aircraft observat
ions up to 460 m above ground level. Under conditions of rapidly varyi
ng surface concentrations (e.g., during episodes of power plant plume
fumigation and early morning boundary layer development), agreement be
tween surface and aloft is dependent upon the spatial (aircraft) and t
emporal (ground) averaging intervals used in the comparison. Under the
se conditions, surface sites may be representative of the PBL only to
within a few kilometers. Under clear skies in the well-mixed PBL, regr
ession of aircraft trace gas data collected within 5 km of the ground
sites against 15-20 min average surface concentrations centered on the
times of the overflights yielded the following relationships: [O-3](a
ircraft) = ([O-3](surface) x 0.9374) + 4.86 ppbv (r(2)=0.9642); [CO](a
ircraft) = ([CO](surface) x 0.8914) + 16.4 ppbv (r(2)=0.9673); [SO2](a
ircraft) = ([SO2](surface) x 0.9414) - 0.069 ppbv (r(2)=0.9945). Altho
ugh O-3, CO, and SO2 measurements at the surface and aloft generally a
greed well, isolated examples of unexplained measurement discrepancies
emerged, illustrating the need for side-by-side instrument comparison
s. NOY measurements agreed poorly between surface and aircraft: [NOY](
aircraft) = ([NOY](surface) X 0.9184) + 4.56 ppbv (r(2) = 0.9188).