L. Boccongibod et al., RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - THE PERINEAL APPROACH INCREASES THE RISK OF SURGICALLY INDUCED POSITIVE MARGINS AND CAPSULAR INCISIONS, The Journal of urology, 160(4), 1998, pp. 1383-1385
Purpose: We compare the incidence of positive surgical margins in pati
ents who underwent perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy for cl
inically localized (stage T1, T2) prostate cancer. Materials and Metho
ds: In this retrospective, nonrandomized study we reexamined the speci
mens of 94 consecutive patients who underwent radical perineal (48) or
retropubic (46) prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cance
r (stage T1, T2) and with pathological stage pT2 (intracapsular), pT3A
(established extracapsular extension without positive margins) or pT3
B (extracapsular extension with positive margins) without lymph node i
nvolvement (NO). We assessed the presence or absence of extracapsular
cancer with or without positive margins, incisions of the prostatic ca
psule exposing cancer (surgically induced positive margins) or benign
glandular tissue. Patients were followed for 3 to 66 months (mean 25)
using an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay with a lower d
etection limit of less than 0.05 ng./ml. Results: The overall incidenc
e of positive margins in cancer tissue was 56% in the perineal and 61%
in the retropubic group, and biochemical failure-free survival was 67
% each. However, surgically induced positive margins in patients with
organ confined disease were more frequent in the perineal than retropu
bic group (43 versus 29%, p <0.05) and associated with a 37% risk of b
iochemical failure (prostate specific antigen greater than 0.1 ng./ml.
) at mean followup. In addition, capsular incisions exposing benign ti
ssue were more frequent in the perineal than retropubic group (90 vers
us 37%, p <0.05) irrespective of pathological stage. Conclusions: Alth
ough overall positive margins and biochemical failure rates are simila
r or identical for the perineal and retropubic approaches for organ co
nfined prostate cancer, the perineal approach is associated with a sig
nificantly higher risk of capsular incisions and surgically induced po
sitive margins and, thus, a higher risk of biochemical failure.