Two independent laboratories have generated Ahr ''null'' or ''knockout
'' mice that share some common characteristics but also have distinct
phenotypes. In this Commentary, we will discuss our view of the candid
ate variables,that might account for these differences. More important
ly, we hope that this discussion can identify important parameters to
be assessed by investigators in the process of characterizing their ow
n modified loci. The variables that we have considered include the pos
sibility that different targeting strategies can result in altered pro
ducts with unsuspected function or that the targeting event itself can
alter the function of neighboring genes. Further, genetic background
can have an important influence on phenotype, and differences in genom
e can be introduced during derivation by the type of embryonic stem ce
lls used and by the random segregation of parental genes in the F2 gen
eration of line propagation. In addition, phenotype may be acutely sen
sitive to environmental variables, such as pathogen and chemical expos
ure and stress introduced by crowding and disease. Finally, we discuss
approaches to resolving differences between null mice and propose a p
artial solution, the institution of a repository for detailed informat
ion on targeted alleles that may not typically be allowed in today's '
'fast paced'' scientific publications. BIOCHEM PHARMACOL 56;7:781-787,
1998. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.