COMPARISON OF 4 NEBULIZER-SPRAY CHAMBER INTERFACES FOR THE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF ARSENIC COMPOUNDS USING INDUCTIVELY-COUPLED PLASMA-MASS SPECTROMETRIC DETECTION
C. Bhymer et al., COMPARISON OF 4 NEBULIZER-SPRAY CHAMBER INTERFACES FOR THE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF ARSENIC COMPOUNDS USING INDUCTIVELY-COUPLED PLASMA-MASS SPECTROMETRIC DETECTION, Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry (Print), 13(9), 1998, pp. 855-858
Four nebulizer-spray chamber combinations mere used and evaluated as i
nterfaces for HPLC with ICP-MS detection, The oscillating capillary ne
bulizer (OCN), the concentric nebulizer and the Meinhard high-efficien
cy nebulizer (HEN) were used with single pass, double pass and cycloni
c spray chambers, Monomethylarsonic acid, dimethylarsinic acid, arseno
betaine and arsenocholine were separated using an ion-pair liquid chro
matographic method on a C-18 column. A calibration curve, limits of de
tection, precision for five injections, peak efficiency and peak asymm
etry were calculated for each compound using each nebulizer-spray cham
ber combination. The HEN with cyclonic spray chamber displayed the low
est detection limits (1.0-2.3 mu g l(-1) for the four arsenic compound
s) and had the lowest precision of duplicate injections (RSD as high a
s 14%). The concentric nebulizer had reasonably low detection limits;
the standard nebulizer had lower detection limits (1.6-3.6 mu g l(-1))
than the cyclonic spray chamber (4.5-11 mu g l(-1)). The OCN had the
highest detection limits under chromatographic conditions identical wi
th those for the other interfaces (160-360 mu g l(-1)). The precision
(RSD) of duplicate injections for the concentric nebulizer and the OCN
ranged from 2.1 to 8.6%.