THE INFLUENCE OF AGE AND ADMINISTRATION RATE ON THE BRAIN SENSITIVITYTO PROPOFOL IN RATS

Citation
Je. Larsson et G. Wahlstrom, THE INFLUENCE OF AGE AND ADMINISTRATION RATE ON THE BRAIN SENSITIVITYTO PROPOFOL IN RATS, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 42(8), 1998, pp. 987-994
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00015172
Volume
42
Issue
8
Year of publication
1998
Pages
987 - 994
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-5172(1998)42:8<987:TIOAAA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Background: It is well established that the dose of propofol for induc tion of anaesthesia is influenced by patient age. This may be explaine d by differences in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. To evaluate the effect of age on propofol pharmacodynamics, the brain concentratio n of propofol at the time of an EEG end-point was used as a measure of CNS sensitivity. Methods: Ninety-five rats were assigned to 4 groups. Anaesthesia was induced by continuous propofol infusion at different rates. The dose of propofol and duration of anaesthesia were determine d from 23 up to 776 days of age. The rats were killed at 23, 287 or 77 6 days of age at the EEG end-point and samples of cerebral cortex, mid brain, cerebellum, serum and fat tissue were submitted to HPLC analysi s of propofol concentrations. Results: The induction dose of propofol varied with age and administration rate. Young animals needed a higher dose of propofol. Old animals had higher brain concentrations of prop ofol at the EEG end-point than young animals. However, propofol concen trations in serum were higher in young animals. The propofol concentra tion in the brain was influenced by the administration rate. Conclusio n: The dose of propofol for induction of anaesthesia in rats is influe nced by animal age and administration rate. Young animals need a large r induction dose than old rats, but are more sensitive as measured by the brain concentration of propofol. The larger induction dose in youn g rats when compared with adults is explained by pharmacokinetic diffe rences rather than by pharmacodynamic changes.