Despite the increasing attention devoted to the study and analysis of
longitudinal data, relatively little consideration has been directed t
oward understanding the issues of reliability and measurement error. P
erhaps one reason for this neglect has been that traditional methods o
f estimation (e.g. generalisability theory) require assumptions that a
re often not tenable in longitudinal designs. This paper first examine
s applications of generalisability theory to the estimation of measure
ment error and reliability in longitudinal research, and notes how fac
tors such as missing data, correlated errors, and true score instabili
ty prohibit traditional variance component estimation. Next, we discus
s how estimation methods using restricted maximum likelihood can accou
nt for these factors, thereby providing many advantages over tradition
al estimation methods. Finally, we provide a substantive example illus
trating these advantages, and include brief discussions of programming
and software considerations.