S. Tiesdell et T. Oc, BEYOND FORTRESS AND PANOPTIC CITIES - TOWARDS A SAFER URBAN PUBLIC REALM, Environment and planning. B, Planning & design, 25(5), 1998, pp. 639-655
In this paper we present a perspective on approaches to enhancing the
feeling of safety in the urban public realm. Many planning and urban d
esign responses to concerns about a lack of safety in city centres see
m often to have led to the 'fortress' city and/or the 'panoptic' city.
These are repressive and oppressive, socially divisive and exclusive,
and deny the city's inhabitants a richer urban experience. We suggest
more positive ways of making city centres feel safer. We start by dis
cussing the concept of the urban public realm, then briefly review cri
me and incivilities, and outline the spectres of the fortress city and
the panoptic city. In the remainder of the paper we discuss positive
strategies for safer city centres. By doing so, we seek to offer a res
istance to the tendencies towards fortress and panoptic cities. The pa
per is aimed primarily at those concerned with the design and manageme
nt of the urban public realm, such as local authorities, planners, urb
an designers, and city-centre managers. There is also a wider audience
that includes retailers, city-centre property owners, the police, and
others with interests in the city centre. Although many of the issues
have universal applicability, the focus here is on English provincial
cities.