In this paper the empirical findings and basic frameworks used in the
evaluation of GIS are reviewed. In the studies reviewed, a variety of
evaluation criteria are employed, but they still contribute sporadic,
unsystematic, and inconclusive evidence. Going beyond a discussion abo
ut the need for measuring GIS impacts, and an uncritical and unselecti
ve adoption of computerized tools, I emphasize here the importance of
assessment and feedback for better adaptation of GIS technology to the
needs of urban planning. Comprehensive, multidimensional, context-bas
ed, and process-based evaluations can contribute valuable information
to guide the developments in GIS technology and to facilitate efforts
in GIS implementation in public and private organizations.