This note evaluates relative ability of the proximity and recently pro
posed directional variants of the spatial model of voter choice to acc
ount for candidate evaluations in US presidential elections contested
between 1980 and 1992. I do this by estimating a statistical model tha
t represents voter preference for a candidate as a weighted average of
proximity and directional components. The analysis corroborates previ
ous studies supporting the directional model, but illustrate that thes
e results are sensitive to statistical specification. Alternative meth
odological specifications favor a mixed directional-proximity model an
d the traditional distance representation.