The 1980s and 90s have seen the proliferation of all forms of performa
nce indicators as part of attempts to command and control health servi
ces. The latest area to receive attention is health outcomes. Publishe
d league tables of mortality and other health outcomes have been avail
able in the United States for some time and in Scotland since the earl
y 1990s; they have now been developed for England and Wales. Publicati
on of these data has proceeded despite warnings as to their limited me
aningfulness and usefulness. The time has come to ask whether the reme
dy is worse than the malady: are published health outcomes contributin
g to quality efforts or subverting more constructive approaches? This
paper argues that attempts to force improvements through publishing he
alth outcomes can be counterproductive, and outlines an alternative ap
proach which involves fostering greater trust in professionalism as a
basis for quality enhancements.