Ways to simulate the making of clear noodles from mung bran starch wer
e investigated by studying the molecular structures of mung bean and t
apioca starches. Scanning electron micrographs showed that tapioca sta
rch granules were smaller than those of mung bean starch. X-ray diffra
ction patterns of mung bean and tapioca starch were A- and C-A-pattern
s, respectively. Iodine affinity studies indicated that mung bean star
ch contained 37% of apparent amylose and tapioca starch contained 24%.
Gel permeation chromatograms showed that mung bean amylopectin had lo
nger peak chain-length of long-branch chains (DP 40) than that of tapi
oca starch (DP 35) but shorter peak chain-length of short-branch chain
s (DP 16) than that of tapioca starch (DP 21). P-31 n.m.r, spectroscop
y showed that both starches contained phosphate monoesters, but only m
ung bean starch contained phospholipids. Physical properties, includin
g pasting viscosity, gel strength, and thermal properties (gelatinizat
ion), were determined. The results of the molecular structure study an
d physical properties were used to develop acceptable products using m
ixtures of cross-linked tapioca and high-amylose maize starches. Tapio
ca starch was cross-linked by sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP) with vari
ous reaction times, pH values, and temperatures. The correlation betwe
en those parameters and the pasting viscosity were studied using a vis
co/amylograph. Starches, cross-linked with 0.1% STMP, pH 11.0, 3.5 h r
eaction time at 25, 35, and 45 degrees C (reaction temperature), were
used for making noodles. High-amylose maize starch (70% amylose) was m
ixed at varying ratios (9, 13, 17, 28, 37, and 44%) with the cross-lin
ked tapioca starches. Analysis of the noodles included: tensile streng
th, water absorption, and soluble loss. Noodle sensory properties were
evaluated using trained panelists. Noodles made from a mixture of cro
ss-linked tapioca starch and 17% of a high-amylose starch were compara
ble to the clear noodles made from mung bean starch. (C) 1998 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.