R. Steinmeier et al., INTRAOPERATIVE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING WITH THE MAGNETOM OPEN SCANNER - CONCEPTS, NEUROSURGICAL INDICATIONS, AND PROCEDURES - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT, Neurosurgery, 43(4), 1998, pp. 739-747
OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now avai
lable with the General Electric MRI system for dedicated intraoperativ
e use. Alternatively, non-dedicated MRI systems require fewer specific
adaptations of instrumentation and surgical techniques. In this repor
t, clinical experiences with such a system are presented. METHODS: All
patients were surgically treated in a ''twin operating theater,'' con
sisting of a conventional operating theater with complete neuronavigat
ion equipment (StealthStation and MKM), which allowed surgery with mag
netically incompatible instruments, conventional instrumentation and o
perating microscope, and a radiofrequency-shielded operating room desi
gned for use with an intraoperative MRI scanner (Magnetom Open; Siemen
s AG, Erlangen, Germany). The Magnetom Open is a 0.2-T MRI scanner wit
h a resistive magnet and specific adaptations that are necessary to in
tegrate the scanner into the surgical environment. The operating theat
ers lie close together, and patients can be intraoperatively transport
ed from one room to the other. This retrospective analysis includes 55
patients with cerebral lesions, all of whom were surgically treated b
etween March 1996 and September 1997. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients wit
h supratentorial tumors were surgically treated (with navigational gui
dance) in the conventional operating room, with intraoperative MRI for
resection control. For 5 of these 31 patients, intraoperative resecti
on control revealed significant tumor remnants, which led to further t
umor resection guided by the information provided by intraoperative MR
I. Intraoperative MRI resection control was performed in 18 transsphen
oidal operations. In cases with suspected tumor remnants, the surgeon
reexplored the sellar region; additional tumor tissue was removed in t
hree of five cases. Follow-up scans were obtained for all patients 1 w
eek and 2 to 3 months after surgery. For 14 of the 18 patients, the im
ages obtained intraoperatively were comparable to those obtained after
2 to 3 months. Intraoperative MRI was also used for six patients unde
rgoing temporal lobe resections for treatment of pharmacoresistant sei
zures. For these patients, the extent of neocortical and mesial resect
ion was tailored to fit the preoperative findings of morphological and
electrophysiological alterations, as well as intraoperative electroco
rticographic findings. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MRI with the Magneto
m Open provides considerable additional information to optimize resect
ion during surgical treatment of supratentorial tumors, pituitary aden
omas, and epilepsy. The twin operating theater is a true alternative t
o a dedicated MRI system. Additional efforts are necessary to improve
patient transportation time and instrument guidance within the scanner
.