Se. Carrick et al., SURGEONS OPINIONS ABOUT THE NHMRC CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF EARLY BREAST-CANCER, Medical journal of Australia, 169(6), 1998, pp. 300-305
Objective: To explore the opinions of surgeons about the NHMRC clinica
l practice guidelines for the management of early breast cancer(the Gu
idelines) and their views about and use of the accompanying Consumer's
guide. Design: Cross-sectional telephone survey. Participants and set
ting: Surgeons throughout Australia who manage breast cancer, designat
ed as ''breast'' or ''general'' (members or non-members of the Royal A
ustralasian College of Surgeons' Section of Breast Surgery) and ''urba
n'' or ''rural''. Results: Among 150 respondents (64% response rate) m
ore than 80% of surgeons reported having read all or most of the Guide
lines and believed they were useful in improving women's management an
d wellbeing, easy to understand, evidence-based, a good summary of rec
ent evidence, and that they would assist agreement between women and h
ealthcare providers. Surgeons agreed with most of the recommendations
in the Guidelines, but 26% disagreed that ''women should ideally be tr
eated by a specialist who treats a large number of similar patients an
d who has access to the full range of treatment options in a multidisc
iplinary setting''. In terms of medicolegal implications, 41% believed
that the Guidelines would protect clinicians, while, of the 37% of su
rgeons who believed that they would expose doctors to increased proble
ms, significantly more breast than general surgeons believed this (50%
v. 19%; P<0.001). Only 37% of surgeons routinely gave the Consumer's
guide to all or more than half their patients. Conclusions: Surgeons a
re generally positive about the Guidelines, but certain issues should
be addressed if they are to be optimally implemented, including confus
ion about the medicolegal implications, perceived difficulties with pr
oviding multidisciplinary care and poor use of the Consumer's guide.