Abm. Siddique et al., HISTOPATHOLOGY AND WITHIN-PLANT DISTRIBUTION OF THE PHYTOPLASMA ASSOCIATED WITH AUSTRALIAN PAPAYA DIEBACK, Plant disease, 82(10), 1998, pp. 1112-1120
Dieback-affected papaya plants were characterized by a discoloration o
f the contents of laticifers, while the anatomy of sieve elements was
healthy in appearance until the necrotic stages of the disorder were r
eached. Laticifer discoloration was not always associated with the pre
sence of phytoplasma in affected tissue, as judged by polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) using primers based on the 16S rRNA gene and 16S-23S i
ntergenic spacer region. Phytoplasma DNA was detected in a range of pl
ant tissues, including roots, but not in mature leaves which would act
as photoassimilate sources. As plants recovered from a dieback period
, the extent of the distribution of both laticifer discoloration and p
hytoplasma DNA decreased. Phytoplasma cells were not observed in trans
mission electron microscopy studies of mature sieve elements of diebac
k-affected leaf, stem, or fruit tissue from plants at various stages o
f symptom expression, although PCR tests indicated the presence of phy
toplasma DNA. Membrane-bound structures, similar in shape and size to
phytoplasma cells but interpreted as autophagic vesicles or latex vesi
cles in immature laticifers, were observed within vacuoles of cells in
phloem tissue in leaves displaying tissue breakdown in the form of a
water-soaked appearance to veins (''X-Y'' patterning). In contrast, ph
ytoplasmas were readily observed in papaya leaves displaying symptoms
of yellow crinkle. We conclude that phytoplasma cells are present in v
ery low titer in dieback-affected tissues and that, while the plant ap
pears to limit proliferation of the dieback-associated pathogen, this
defense strategy is ultimately unsuccessful because it is associated w
ith a rapid decline of the papaya plant.