MICELLE AGGREGATION NUMBERS OF SURFACTANTS IN AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE RESULTS FROM STEADY-STATE AND TIME-RESOLVED FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING
Rg. Alargova et al., MICELLE AGGREGATION NUMBERS OF SURFACTANTS IN AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE RESULTS FROM STEADY-STATE AND TIME-RESOLVED FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING, Langmuir, 14(19), 1998, pp. 5412-5418
The aggregation numbers of the surfactant aggregates in surfactant-con
taining systems can be measured using the steady-state fluorescence qu
enching (SSFQ) and the time-resolved fluorescence quenching (TRFQ) met
hods. From a theoretical point of view the SSFQ method involves much m
ore restrictive assumptions than the TRFQ method. As a result, the ran
ge of aggregation numbers that can be measured with SSFQ does not exte
nd to values as high as with TRFQ. Nevertheless, SSFQ is much used bec
ause the measurements are easy to perform and only require readily ava
ilable spectrofluorometers. The purpose of this study was to compare a
s completely as possible the two methods. For this purpose we have per
formed systematic determinations of the values of the surfactant aggre
gation number in micellar solutions in pure water and in water + polym
er and oil-in-water microemulsions, using SSFQ and TRFQ. A good agreem
ent between the two methods is observed when the quenching rate consta
nt of the fluorescent probe (here pyrene) is at least 5 times larger t
han the decay rate constant of the probe in the presence of air. For l
ower values of this ratio, the discrepancy between the two values incr
eases very rapidly and examples are given where SSFQ yields values up
to 4 times smaller than TRFQ. The discrepancy between the two methods
also increases with the microviscosity of the aggregate. The results c
all for caution when using SSFQ, particularly for systems where the mi
croviscosity is expected to he large and the aggregation numbers are n
ot very small.