W. Dewit et al., ONLY HYDROSALPINGES VISIBLE ON ULTRASOUND ARE ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCEDIMPLANTATION AND PREGNANCY RATES AFTER IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION, Human reproduction (Oxford. Print), 13(6), 1998, pp. 1696-1701
A retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data was made of a
ll in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients with tubal pathology who had
their first ever embryo transfer cycle between January Ist, 1992 and S
eptember Ist, 1996, The aim of the study was to determine the effect o
f the presence of a hydrosalpinx, whether or not visible by ultrasound
, on pregnancy, multiple pregnancy and implantation rates in our patie
nt population. The IVF success rate was also analysed by calculating c
umulative ongoing pregnancy rates of the same patient group using the
lifetime table approach. In the presence of an ultrasound-visible hydr
osalpinx, rates of pregnancy and multiple pregnancy appeared reduced,
but the differences were not significant. The rates of implantation, c
linical implantation and ongoing implantation were significantly lower
in the presence of an ultrasound-visible hydrosalpinx (odds ratios 0.
33-0.46, C.I, 0.21-0.96), The cumulative chance of achieving an ongoin
g pregnancy after one or more IVF cycles was significantly reduced in
the presence of an ultrasound-visible hydrosalpinx (relative hazard 0.
36, C.I. 0.22-0.59). In the presence of a hydrosalpinx not visible by
ultrasound the IVF outcome was not reduced. This retrospective study c
onfirms that patients with hydrosalpinges have an impaired IVF outcome
. Unique to this study and previously unobserved is the finding that t
here is a subgroup of patients with hydrosalpinges, those with ultraso
und-visible hydrosalpinges, which is exclusively responsible for this
impaired outcome.